Members, Trusted Users
896
edits
Talk:GTA V Era: Difference between revisions
contributed to discussion
No edit summary |
(contributed to discussion) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Disagree - it's the other way around. Every new-number game starts a new era. The possibility of GTA V doing something different (such as continuing IV era) is just speculation. There are many things in the trailer that back-up the new era, such as no recurring characters (ignore speculation) and 99% of brands in the game being new. It's a new era. --[[User:Gboyers|gboyers]] <sup>[[User_talk:Gboyers|talk]]</sup> 21:44, 5 November 2011 (GMT) | Disagree - it's the other way around. Every new-number game starts a new era. The possibility of GTA V doing something different (such as continuing IV era) is just speculation. There are many things in the trailer that back-up the new era, such as no recurring characters (ignore speculation) and 99% of brands in the game being new. It's a new era. --[[User:Gboyers|gboyers]] <sup>[[User_talk:Gboyers|talk]]</sup> 21:44, 5 November 2011 (GMT) | ||
:I agree with Gboyers, as every other game in the franchise with a new number begins a new era, we should assume the same pattern continues with future GTA games unless anything changes. It would be quite confusing if Rockstar classed GTA V as a title existing in the GTA IV era, and then release a totally new era later on, also named GTA V. Does this make sense to anyone? Or is the point I am trying to put across unclear.--[[User:Montario|Montario]] ([[User talk:Montario|talk]]) 22:03, 5 November 2011 (GMT) | |||