Members, Trusted Users
896
edits
Talk:GTA V Era: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
(contributed to discussion) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
Disagree - it's the other way around. Every new-number game starts a new era. The possibility of GTA V doing something different (such as continuing IV era) is just speculation. There are many things in the trailer that back-up the new era, such as no recurring characters (ignore speculation) and 99% of brands in the game being new. It's a new era. --[[User:Gboyers|gboyers]] <sup>[[User_talk:Gboyers|talk]]</sup> 21:44, 5 November 2011 (GMT) | Disagree - it's the other way around. Every new-number game starts a new era. The possibility of GTA V doing something different (such as continuing IV era) is just speculation. There are many things in the trailer that back-up the new era, such as no recurring characters (ignore speculation) and 99% of brands in the game being new. It's a new era. --[[User:Gboyers|gboyers]] <sup>[[User_talk:Gboyers|talk]]</sup> 21:44, 5 November 2011 (GMT) | ||
:I agree with Gboyers, as every other game in the franchise with a new number begins a new era, we should assume the same pattern continues with future GTA games unless anything changes. It would be quite confusing if Rockstar classed GTA V as a title existing in the GTA IV era, and then release a totally new era later on, also named GTA V. Does this make sense to anyone? Or is the point I am trying to put across unclear.--[[User:Montario|Montario]] ([[User talk:Montario|talk]]) 22:03, 5 November 2011 (GMT) | :I agree with Gboyers, as every other game in the franchise with a new number begins a new era, we should assume the same pattern continues with future GTA games unless anything changes. It would be quite confusing if Rockstar classed GTA V as a title existing in the GTA IV era, and then release a totally new era later on, also named GTA V. They cannot just name the new era GTA VI, as that would lose the chronology of era numbers, 1,2,3,4,6. Does this make sense to anyone? Or is the point I am trying to put across unclear.--[[User:Montario|Montario]] ([[User talk:Montario|talk]]) 22:03, 5 November 2011 (GMT) | ||