392
edits
Talk:Uni-Tel: Difference between revisions
Sigh
No edit summary |
(Sigh) |
||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
::::Believe me when I say I get your point. You want articles like Uni-Tel deleted because you see little relevance to this wiki. However, I disagree with this idea. About half of the character pages that are currently here could be deleted at this rate, as could several articles about locations (such as [[Liberty City in GTA 1]], [[Liberty City in GTA III]] and [[Liberty City in GTA IV]]). This wiki is an attempt to detail everything in the series and yet there are people such as yourself who continue to want certain articles deleted because they do not reach your notability criteria. This type of policy should not be implemented here, otherwise it would make this entire project a complete joke in my opinion. [[User:A-Dust|A-Dust]] 13:49, 4 June 2008 (UTC) | ::::Believe me when I say I get your point. You want articles like Uni-Tel deleted because you see little relevance to this wiki. However, I disagree with this idea. About half of the character pages that are currently here could be deleted at this rate, as could several articles about locations (such as [[Liberty City in GTA 1]], [[Liberty City in GTA III]] and [[Liberty City in GTA IV]]). This wiki is an attempt to detail everything in the series and yet there are people such as yourself who continue to want certain articles deleted because they do not reach your notability criteria. This type of policy should not be implemented here, otherwise it would make this entire project a complete joke in my opinion. [[User:A-Dust|A-Dust]] 13:49, 4 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
:::::Sorry, but I don't believe you because you just made it clear, ''yet again'', that you're making only a half-hearted attempt to understand my argument and still don't comprehend it; by suggesting that I consider a two-sentence article about an insignificant, inaccessible and completely unremarkable building to be equal in importance with articles about an entire city and the differences between each iteration of it. This is an absurdly poor comparison (in fact, there ''is'' no comparison) and only serves to prove you're not taking anything I say seriously. I suspect you simply decided that I'm advocating harsh, Wikipedia-esque practices of deleting things on the flimsiest of justification even if they're useful (which is ''not at all'' what I'm trying to achieve), but I suppose it's too late to change your opinion of me now.<br> | |||
:::::Look, all I ask is this: put aside whatever prejudice you may have about my opinion, try to keep an open mind, and carefully review everything I've said; as you apparently still don't understand what I'm trying to say and have consistently failed to respond with anything but defensive rhetoric like the travel agency = Liberty City argument. Just to make it easy, I'll re-state my point. The line that divides notable content from pointless content is a fine one, but it has to be drawn somewhere (and already is, even here), and I simply feel it should be drawn just above articles ''like'' this one (not ''just'' this one), which serve no informative or practical purpose. --[[User:MattyDienhoff|MattyDienhoff]] 14:35, 4 June 2008 (UTC) | |||