Talk:Myths in GTA San Andreas: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(→Deletion?: new section) |
||
| Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
hey if i was to have a camera i would of recorded it and no swearing all you need to do is go to a place to investigate the myth im not forcing you your worst then some of the other skeptics. user--[[User:Stephendwan|Stephendwan]] 16:59, 1 August 2009 (UTC) | hey if i was to have a camera i would of recorded it and no swearing all you need to do is go to a place to investigate the myth im not forcing you your worst then some of the other skeptics. user--[[User:Stephendwan|Stephendwan]] 16:59, 1 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
== Deletion? == | |||
Spaceeinstein suggested a deletion of this page. I have to say, it'd certainly solve some of the problems which seem to come from asking which myths are "Worthy" of inclusion, or indeed if myths are canon at all. I was originally opposed to this, but I have to say, I've come around. If someone wants to keep it (and some will. I may well do myself, as I think it's a good article, and wouldn't like to see all the work gone to waste), they can always duplicate it in their userspace (eg, I'd put it in [[User:C-d-rom/Myths in GTA San Andreas]]. There you can be free to edit it as you will, add whatever you think is necessary. It's non-canon, it's not misinforming people. I haven't actually inserted a delete tag yet, it's up to a mod if they want to actually do that or not... [[User:C-d-rom|C-d-rom]] 17:02, 1 August 2009 (UTC) | |||