Talk:To Live and Die in Alderney: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 17 July 2008 by EPX2 in topic Copyright infringement?
(New page: ==Copyright infringement?== This entire article has been lifted directly from the following page: [http://www.gta4.net/missions/chapter-three.php] (Alternate link, if the site isn't loadi...) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
[http://www.gta4.net/missions/chapter-three.php] (Alternate link, if the site isn't loading: [http://72.14.205.104/search?q=cache:kkkg_rQjFEEJ:www.gta4.net/missions/chapter-three.php+angie+pegorino+is+seen+leaving+the+office&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us]) | [http://www.gta4.net/missions/chapter-three.php] (Alternate link, if the site isn't loading: [http://72.14.205.104/search?q=cache:kkkg_rQjFEEJ:www.gta4.net/missions/chapter-three.php+angie+pegorino+is+seen+leaving+the+office&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us]) | ||
Usually, what I'd do is immediately flag the article for deletion, but since the site isn't loading for me, I can't verify if they've permitted this sort of thing. However, logic dictates (to me) that they'd object to their content being used without explicit permission, and I highly doubt any permission was given (since they more than likely would've mandated that credit be given to the site in the article). | Usually, what I'd do is immediately flag the article for deletion, but since the site isn't loading for me, I can't verify if they've permitted this sort of thing. However, logic dictates (to me) that they'd object to their content being used without explicit permission, and I highly doubt any permission was given (since they more than likely would've mandated that credit be given to the site in the article). – [[User:EPX2|<b><i>EP</i></b>]] <small>([[User talk:EPX2|Talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/EPX2|Edits]])</small> 12:25, 17 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 12:25, 17 July 2008
Copyright infringement?
This entire article has been lifted directly from the following page:
[1] (Alternate link, if the site isn't loading: [2])
Usually, what I'd do is immediately flag the article for deletion, but since the site isn't loading for me, I can't verify if they've permitted this sort of thing. However, logic dictates (to me) that they'd object to their content being used without explicit permission, and I highly doubt any permission was given (since they more than likely would've mandated that credit be given to the site in the article). – EP (Talk • Edits) 12:25, 17 July 2008 (UTC)