3,040
edits
Talk:Karen/spoilers: Difference between revisions
Reply.
GuildKnight (talk | contribs) (response) |
(Reply.) |
||
| Line 85: | Line 85: | ||
:I disagree; placing a spoiler "warning" next to a link to a mission does not seem (to me, anyway) obvious that the spoiler is related to Michelle. However, as long as we give the readers the option of learning the spoiler, without forcing them to, it's fine with me. --[[:w:c:gta:User:GuildKnight|GuildKnight]]<sup>[[:w:c:gta:User_talk:GuildKnight|Talk2me]]</sup> 22:41, 20 July 2008 (UTC) | :I disagree; placing a spoiler "warning" next to a link to a mission does not seem (to me, anyway) obvious that the spoiler is related to Michelle. However, as long as we give the readers the option of learning the spoiler, without forcing them to, it's fine with me. --[[:w:c:gta:User:GuildKnight|GuildKnight]]<sup>[[:w:c:gta:User_talk:GuildKnight|Talk2me]]</sup> 22:41, 20 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
::Well, as you mentioned, anyone reading a mission article should be prepared for spoilers, so why would we put it next to a ''link'' to the mission article as well? Wouldn't that make it obvious, when only ''one'' mission has a spoiler warning attached under a separate article? I think our readers are smarter than you're giving them credit for. :-P '''[[User:Eganio|Eganio]]<sup>''[[User talk:Eganio|Talk]]''</sup>''' 22:45, 20 July 2008 (UTC) | |||