1,623
edits
Talk:Karen/spoilers: Difference between revisions
m
tweak
GuildKnight (talk | contribs) (response) |
GuildKnight (talk | contribs) m (tweak) |
||
| Line 88: | Line 88: | ||
::Well, as you mentioned, anyone reading a mission article should be prepared for spoilers, so why would we put it next to a ''link'' to the mission article as well? Wouldn't that make it obvious, when only ''one'' mission has a spoiler warning attached under a separate article? I think our readers are smarter than you're giving them credit for. :-P '''[[User:Eganio|Eganio]]<sup>''[[User talk:Eganio|Talk]]''</sup>''' 22:45, 20 July 2008 (UTC) | ::Well, as you mentioned, anyone reading a mission article should be prepared for spoilers, so why would we put it next to a ''link'' to the mission article as well? Wouldn't that make it obvious, when only ''one'' mission has a spoiler warning attached under a separate article? I think our readers are smarter than you're giving them credit for. :-P '''[[User:Eganio|Eganio]]<sup>''[[User talk:Eganio|Talk]]''</sup>''' 22:45, 20 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
:::I do see your point. Gboyers suggested having a ==Related Missions== header, with a note underneath, "Bear in mind that mission pages may contain spoilers." I think that would work better. --[[:w:c:gta:User:GuildKnight|GuildKnight]]<sup>[[:w:c:gta:User_talk:GuildKnight|Talk2me]]</sup> 23:22, 20 July 2008 (UTC) | :::I do see your point. Gboyers suggested having a ==Related Missions== header, with a note underneath, "This is a list of missions related to Michelle. Bear in mind that mission pages may contain spoilers." I think that would work better. --[[:w:c:gta:User:GuildKnight|GuildKnight]]<sup>[[:w:c:gta:User_talk:GuildKnight|Talk2me]]</sup> 23:22, 20 July 2008 (UTC) | ||