Talk:Ratman: Difference between revisions

Talk:Ratman (view source)

Revision as of 16:54, 6 February 2010

416 bytes removed , 6 February 2010

no edit summary

VisualWikitext

Anonymous user

gtw>Tommygunner32

Revision as of 18:44, 3 February 2010 (view source) gtw>Tommygunner32 No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 16:54, 6 February 2010 (view source) gtw>Tommygunner32 No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 36:		Line 36:

	Hovever, I dont think this article should be deleted, mainly for the sake of posterity. The phenomena is something that was somewhat notable in the online IV community and it should be left so as to document it, as with the much more notable "Bigfoot". At least so long as this artice doesn't become a page to post "OMG I SAW IT ONLINE WITH MAH BUDDEHS ONE TIME, ALSO ITS REAL" and instead takes a logical stance on the matter. [[User:NeoGunKuruma\|NeoGunKuruma]] 21:58, February 2, 2010 (UTC)		Hovever, I dont think this article should be deleted, mainly for the sake of posterity. The phenomena is something that was somewhat notable in the online IV community and it should be left so as to document it, as with the much more notable "Bigfoot". At least so long as this artice doesn't become a page to post "OMG I SAW IT ONLINE WITH MAH BUDDEHS ONE TIME, ALSO ITS REAL" and instead takes a logical stance on the matter. [[User:NeoGunKuruma\|NeoGunKuruma]] 21:58, February 2, 2010 (UTC)

	I agree with neo,And i think Ratman could or could not be true and therefor shouldn't be deleted , ratman has inspired many peaple to go looking for him and has proven to be quite fun,A guy called III RATMAN III on the xbox has even tried to become ratman , thets just how far people will go, No one can prove he's real but they cant prove he isnt as well so that can be something to think about.SO KEEP LOOKING!!!