Community:Promotion/Gsf4l: Difference between revisions
→Questions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
You can do this as a regular user. Just hit the "History" link at the top of the page to see everyones edits (or go to recent-edits), then click the "Diff" button next to the edit that you want to look at in more detail. Look at [[Staff]] to see what extra tools and rights staff have. [[User:Gboyers|Gboyers]] <sup>[[User_talk:Gboyers|talk]]</sup> 14:42, December 13, 2009 (UTC) | You can do this as a regular user. Just hit the "History" link at the top of the page to see everyones edits (or go to recent-edits), then click the "Diff" button next to the edit that you want to look at in more detail. Look at [[Staff]] to see what extra tools and rights staff have. [[User:Gboyers|Gboyers]] <sup>[[User_talk:Gboyers|talk]]</sup> 14:42, December 13, 2009 (UTC) | ||
I think that the protect talk pages is a good one. Mainly because I always reply to talks, especially if I know what they mean. Also patrolling is quite good aswell. I think using these tools would be a bigger advantage. But however I do not know what the "Rollback Edits" mean. If you tell me I wouldd have a bigger idea. Please do not decline the nomination, because I do not know what this means. - GSF4L | I think that the protect talk pages is a good one. Mainly because I always reply to talks, especially if I know what they mean. Also patrolling is quite good aswell. I think using these tools would be a bigger advantage. But however I do not know what the "Rollback Edits" mean. If you tell me I wouldd have a bigger idea. Please do not decline the nomination, because I do not know what this means. However with the patrolling, It would be of great use to me, as i frequently check what everyone is doing in the GTW world. I mostly edit them, if they are wrong, as in they are messy, they need gramatical checks, or if it is incorrect information. - GSF4L | ||
<!-- ADD OTHER QUESTIONS BELOW --> | <!-- ADD OTHER QUESTIONS BELOW --> |