13,618
edits
User talk:ReiV: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
: Those edits are indeed not significant objectively-talking, but in my opinion they are nice. I believe so. And they don't contradict the rules. I didn't ignore your request, as you haven't made one prior to my action. As for username, well, they were made after I made that edit, so my theory would be is that someone is trying to blackmail me, probably that was your evil masterplan to post that link all over Internet to portray me as a bad person, but I have no evidence for that (just like you don't have evidence for me and that guy posting those link to be the same person). Or it can be just a pure concidence. Whatever it is, something which happens on a completely separate website is a different matter and has nothing to do with this Wikipedia (i.e. other sites are not under the jurisdiction of your website and vice-versa). I've re-read the rules of your website and I don't see how am I violating something, as officiality is a (this word again) subjective concept without a clear definition, and furthermore, it is never stated is it official... relatively to what? Then, why is Wikipedia allowed? It is has nothing to do with Rockstar, it is edited by entirely random people (one don't even have to sign up, like here) and has absolutely no legal connection to the word "official". Thereofe, Wikipedia must removed from external links as well. | : Those edits are indeed not significant objectively-talking, but in my opinion they are nice. I believe so. And they don't contradict the rules. I didn't ignore your request, as you haven't made one prior to my action. As for username, well, they were made after I made that edit, so my theory would be is that someone is trying to blackmail me, probably that was your evil masterplan to post that link all over Internet to portray me as a bad person, but I have no evidence for that (just like you don't have evidence for me and that guy posting those link to be the same person). Or it can be just a pure concidence. Whatever it is, something which happens on a completely separate website is a different matter and has nothing to do with this Wikipedia (i.e. other sites are not under the jurisdiction of your website and vice-versa). I've re-read the rules of your website and I don't see how am I violating something, as officiality is a (this word again) subjective concept without a clear definition, and furthermore, it is never stated is it official... relatively to what? Then, why is Wikipedia allowed? It is has nothing to do with Rockstar, it is edited by entirely random people (one don't even have to sign up, like here) and has absolutely no legal connection to the word "official". Thereofe, Wikipedia must removed from external links as well. | ||
: With those "evidences" you are trying to lurk me into somekind of paralogism trap, bifurcation so-to-say, as those "evidences" don't... evidence anything. [[User:ReiV|ReiV]] ([[User talk:ReiV|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/ReiV|edits]]) 13:16, 8 April 2015 (BST) | : With those "evidences" you are trying to lurk me into somekind of paralogism trap, bifurcation so-to-say, as those "evidences" don't... evidence anything. [[User:ReiV|ReiV]] ([[User talk:ReiV|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/ReiV|edits]]) 13:16, 8 April 2015 (BST) | ||
I have no problem with those edits, only the links. I did mention "official sites plus Wikipedia" as the links we generally allow on major pages (for a variety of reasons, but that's our choice to make). External links and Advertising are mentioned in our [[Grand Theft Wiki: Cleanup| Cleanup]] and [[Grand Theft Wiki:Behaviour|Behaviour]] policies. However, our [[Grand Theft Wiki:Enforcement|Enforcement Policy]] also give staff the discretion to interpret [[Grand Theft Wiki:Policy|Policy]] for the best interests of the wiki, rather than purely following strict codified rules. Lastly, as this is my website, I can make a final decision as to what is allowed here (as explained [[Grand Theft Wiki:About Policy|here]]). So, regardless of anything else, I ask you not to link to that site on this wiki. My reason for that I hope is clear - I don't believe it adds value in those locations, I don't have a reason to link to that site rather than any others, and I believe the motivation to be to advertise that site. Hopefully that's understood. [[User:Gboyers|gboyers]] <sup>[[User_talk:Gboyers|talk]]</sup> 13:40, 8 April 2015 (BST) | |||