Community:Promotion/George: Difference between revisions
→Probationary Adminship
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
:I am going to extend the probation period a bit more - I don't think one week is enough to prove someone's worth. Maybe on the fast-paced Wikipedia, but not Grand Theft Wiki. Let's try two weeks. Don't forget that this is judging whether you would be a successful admin, not a good editor. On other sites (including The GTA Place) I've promoted someone because they're good members, but they end up never doing anything as staff. Next weekend I'll take a look at all your contributions and make a judgement on that. [[User:Xenon|Xenon]] ([[Sysop|Admin]]) [[User talk:Xenon|talk]] 22:08, 29 April 2007 (BST) | :I am going to extend the probation period a bit more - I don't think one week is enough to prove someone's worth. Maybe on the fast-paced Wikipedia, but not Grand Theft Wiki. Let's try two weeks. Don't forget that this is judging whether you would be a successful admin, not a good editor. On other sites (including The GTA Place) I've promoted someone because they're good members, but they end up never doing anything as staff. Next weekend I'll take a look at all your contributions and make a judgement on that. [[User:Xenon|Xenon]] ([[Sysop|Admin]]) [[User talk:Xenon|talk]] 22:08, 29 April 2007 (BST) | ||
* Ok, i'll be doing my best, and i'll be keeping an eye on [[user:GTA Pro also]]. [[User:George|George]] 04:56, 30 April 2007 (BST) | |||