Community talk:Hub: Difference between revisions
→Standardized vehicle article layout: YES
GuildKnight (talk | contribs) m (maintenance - un-linking to remove a link from wanted pages) |
|||
| Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
So I've put together an '''[[User:MattyDienhoff/sandbox|example]]''' of how I think a vehicle article should be laid out, with an in-depth explanation of my thinking behind it on the [[User_talk:MattyDienhoff/sandbox|associated talk page]]. Please take a look and give your opinion on it, and hopefully we can agree on a standardized design for vehicle articles, preventing disagreements. --[[User:MattyDienhoff|MattyDienhoff]] 19:44, 30 July 2008 (UTC) | So I've put together an '''[[User:MattyDienhoff/sandbox|example]]''' of how I think a vehicle article should be laid out, with an in-depth explanation of my thinking behind it on the [[User_talk:MattyDienhoff/sandbox|associated talk page]]. Please take a look and give your opinion on it, and hopefully we can agree on a standardized design for vehicle articles, preventing disagreements. --[[User:MattyDienhoff|MattyDienhoff]] 19:44, 30 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
:That layout would work well. I agree that there needs to be a standard... every GTA IV vehicle page I come across is either poorly worded, redundant, disorganized, or just a stub. [[User:Thevictor390|Thevictor390]] 17:53, 16 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
== UserRights == | == UserRights == | ||