Talk:Vice City in GTA IV Era: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 01:56, 19 February 2010

thanks for all the refrences, but why did u take my pic off

The image was taken out of the article because it has no relevance to the article. A-Dust 18:15, January 24, 2010 (UTC)

You're welcome for the references, and to A-Dust: The picture is somewhat relevant, because it's the poster in which mocks the next possiblilty of the new Grand Theft Auto location. Which could be Vice City. I'm sure thats why he had that picture on there. Grand Theft AJ 00:49, January 25, 2010 (UTC)

yer thats y and i was actually going to do a sub topic on it .

p.s : im not a he im a she. User:Lozzy94

Oh haha, sorry. I'm pretty sure you can put that poster back up, just make the caption at the bottom something like "A Rockstar poster teasing the next location of the new Grand Theft Auto game." Then it shouldn't be taken down. Grand Theft AJ 03:25, January 26, 2010 (UTC)

okay thanks User:Lozzy94

But this would imply that Vice City will be the next location for GTA. It's too misleading. There are not enough evidence to suggest that VC would be the next location.--Spaceeinstein 01:56, February 19, 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:12, 26 January 2010 (view source) gtw>Lozzy94 No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 01:56, 19 February 2010 (view source) Spaceeinstein (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 11:		Line 11:

	okay thanks [[User:Lozzy94]]		okay thanks [[User:Lozzy94]]

			:But this would imply that Vice City will be the next location for GTA. It's too misleading. There are not enough evidence to suggest that VC would be the next location.--'''[[User:Spaceeinstein\|Spaceeinstein]]''' 01:56, February 19, 2010 (UTC)