Talk:Karen/spoilers: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (added some separator lines, to aid discussion (people dont have to read the entire conversation)) |
||
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
::Definitely agreed. I find GTW to be ''far'' more community-based, unlike Wikipedia, which always seemed to be the "encyclopedia anyone can edit...as long as admin approves." :-P '''[[User:Eganio|Eganio]]<sup>''[[User talk:Eganio|Talk]]''</sup>''' 10:00, 18 July 2008 (UTC) | ::Definitely agreed. I find GTW to be ''far'' more community-based, unlike Wikipedia, which always seemed to be the "encyclopedia anyone can edit...as long as admin approves." :-P '''[[User:Eganio|Eganio]]<sup>''[[User talk:Eganio|Talk]]''</sup>''' 10:00, 18 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
---- | |||
Alright, the discussion seems to have stalled, and nothing is being done about the spoiler. I think [[User:KalypsoSig|KalypsoSig's]] ideas on creating a page for Michelle are sound. I have removed the spoiler detail on the [[Michelle]] disambig page. What should be done is this: create a page for [[Michelle (IV)]] the girlfriend, on which '''only''' information about dating her while she's undercover should be present. Then, on [[Karen|this page]], we can keep the appropriate details about her being an undercover agent, and should add a spoiler tag. The question is: do we link [[Michelle (IV)]] with this page, vice-versa, or both? I say we only link the [[Michelle (IV)]] page with this page, which will hopefully eliminate accidental blowing of Karen's cover for someone who still only knows her as Michelle. Thoughts? '''[[User:Eganio|Eganio]]<sup>''[[User talk:Eganio|Talk]]''</sup>''' 20:31, 3 July 2008 (UTC) | Alright, the discussion seems to have stalled, and nothing is being done about the spoiler. I think [[User:KalypsoSig|KalypsoSig's]] ideas on creating a page for Michelle are sound. I have removed the spoiler detail on the [[Michelle]] disambig page. What should be done is this: create a page for [[Michelle (IV)]] the girlfriend, on which '''only''' information about dating her while she's undercover should be present. Then, on [[Karen|this page]], we can keep the appropriate details about her being an undercover agent, and should add a spoiler tag. The question is: do we link [[Michelle (IV)]] with this page, vice-versa, or both? I say we only link the [[Michelle (IV)]] page with this page, which will hopefully eliminate accidental blowing of Karen's cover for someone who still only knows her as Michelle. Thoughts? '''[[User:Eganio|Eganio]]<sup>''[[User talk:Eganio|Talk]]''</sup>''' 20:31, 3 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
| Line 57: | Line 59: | ||
:I agree that the line made by Gboyers was a bit obvious, but if we mention the word secret it'll be more obvious, I don't think that there is any real answer to this. So I agree with you I guess Eganio. [[User:Biggest gta fan ever|Biggest gta fan ever]] 06:53, 20 July 2008 (UTC) | :I agree that the line made by Gboyers was a bit obvious, but if we mention the word secret it'll be more obvious, I don't think that there is any real answer to this. So I agree with you I guess Eganio. [[User:Biggest gta fan ever|Biggest gta fan ever]] 06:53, 20 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
---- | |||
I had made that addition only 3 days ago, so it isn't as if everything had stalled. You also failed to discuss your removal of that sentence, and simply reverted another user's edit without explanation. I also slightly feel that you are overestimating this plot development, due to you not having played GTA IV (I believe). Yes it is a surprise, and yes it totally re-establishes an entire character; but it is only halfway through the storyline that this is revealed, and it doesn't affect anything else. Yes we should protect people from finding out if they don't want to know, but if they DO want to know then we should allow them to find out. | I had made that addition only 3 days ago, so it isn't as if everything had stalled. You also failed to discuss your removal of that sentence, and simply reverted another user's edit without explanation. I also slightly feel that you are overestimating this plot development, due to you not having played GTA IV (I believe). Yes it is a surprise, and yes it totally re-establishes an entire character; but it is only halfway through the storyline that this is revealed, and it doesn't affect anything else. Yes we should protect people from finding out if they don't want to know, but if they DO want to know then we should allow them to find out. | ||