Talk:The Clymenus Suite: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:


:A lot of people add a "trivia" section to include random bits of information about the subject, which I've never been keen on. This is usually pretty dull, basic or irrelevant information that would better be put into a sentence in the article. A trivia section would only be useful for little-known but interesting facts. This article just lists nearby locations, which is completely useless. A better way to do it would be to link to the area of [[Vice City]] which it is in, such as [[Vice Beach]], and let ''that'' article explain what is nearby. Feel free to remove this section! [[User:Gboyers|Gboyers]] <sup>[[User_talk:Gboyers|talk]]</sup> 10:05, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
:A lot of people add a "trivia" section to include random bits of information about the subject, which I've never been keen on. This is usually pretty dull, basic or irrelevant information that would better be put into a sentence in the article. A trivia section would only be useful for little-known but interesting facts. This article just lists nearby locations, which is completely useless. A better way to do it would be to link to the area of [[Vice City]] which it is in, such as [[Vice Beach]], and let ''that'' article explain what is nearby. Feel free to remove this section! [[User:Gboyers|Gboyers]] <sup>[[User_talk:Gboyers|talk]]</sup> 10:05, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
::I imagine this was brought about by my editing of the 'Trivia' section, it was just a spelling and grammar thing. I do agree with the Trivia in this section to be useless, but on other pages, I find it rather interesting, and more or less the best part of the article to read. [[User:Ess-Tee|Ess-Tee]] 11:52, 6 June 2009 (UTC)