Talk:Collectibles: Difference between revisions
GuildKnight (talk | contribs) (→Organization: response) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Any advice on how to organize this article would be greatly appreciated. So far, I have separated [[Unique Stunt Jumps]] into their constituent parts, according to [[GTA III Era]] and [[GTA IV]]. However, I also have a subheading ''GTA San Andreas'' under the ''GTA III Era'' heading, which says collectibles are subdivided into 4 constituents, but doesn't include the Unique Jumps (the fifth component). How should we arrange this stuff? It seems a little awkward to me as is. '''[[User:Eganio|Eganio]]<sup>''[[User talk:Eganio|Talk]]''</sup>''' 21:38, 29 June 2008 (UTC) | Any advice on how to organize this article would be greatly appreciated. So far, I have separated [[Unique Stunt Jumps]] into their constituent parts, according to [[GTA III Era]] and [[GTA IV]]. However, I also have a subheading ''GTA San Andreas'' under the ''GTA III Era'' heading, which says collectibles are subdivided into 4 constituents, but doesn't include the Unique Jumps (the fifth component). How should we arrange this stuff? It seems a little awkward to me as is. '''[[User:Eganio|Eganio]]<sup>''[[User talk:Eganio|Talk]]''</sup>''' 21:38, 29 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
:I kind of think that San Andreas' collectibles ''are'' hidden packages. If Tiki statues and ballons are, why not oysters, horseshoes, etc.? So, whaddaya think of my reformat? --[[:w:c:gta:User:GuildKnight|GuildKnight]]<sup>[[:w:c:gta:User_talk:GuildKnight|Talk2me]]</sup> 02:35, 30 June 2008 (UTC) | :I kind of think that San Andreas' collectibles ''are'' hidden packages. If Tiki statues and ballons are, why not oysters, horseshoes, etc.? So, whaddaya think of my reformat? --[[:w:c:gta:User:GuildKnight|GuildKnight]]<sup>[[:w:c:gta:User_talk:GuildKnight|Talk2me]]</sup> 02:35, 30 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
::That looks great, [[User:GuildKnight|GuildKnight]], thank you! However, my question was more along the lines of whether we should try to include the [[Unique Stunt Jumps]] in with the other [[GTA San Andreas]] collectibles, as they are, at least in my mind, collectibles as well. What do you think? '''[[User:Eganio|Eganio]]<sup>''[[User talk:Eganio|Talk]]''</sup>''' 02:48, 30 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:48, 30 June 2008
In GTA III, there are 100 white bundles (implied to be cocaine) in Liberty City.
I always thought that, more to the point, the bundles were SPANK, which in turn is a fictional drug probably based on cocaine. --MattyDienhoff 16:56, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, you're right. This is just a slight oversight, so feel free to edit it. Well spotted - Gboyers talk 17:01, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
Organization
Any advice on how to organize this article would be greatly appreciated. So far, I have separated Unique Stunt Jumps into their constituent parts, according to GTA III Era and GTA IV. However, I also have a subheading GTA San Andreas under the GTA III Era heading, which says collectibles are subdivided into 4 constituents, but doesn't include the Unique Jumps (the fifth component). How should we arrange this stuff? It seems a little awkward to me as is. EganioTalk 21:38, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
- I kind of think that San Andreas' collectibles are hidden packages. If Tiki statues and ballons are, why not oysters, horseshoes, etc.? So, whaddaya think of my reformat? --GuildKnightTalk2me 02:35, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
- That looks great, GuildKnight, thank you! However, my question was more along the lines of whether we should try to include the Unique Stunt Jumps in with the other GTA San Andreas collectibles, as they are, at least in my mind, collectibles as well. What do you think? EganioTalk 02:48, 30 June 2008 (UTC)