13,610
edits
User talk:Gboyers/archive8: Difference between revisions
m
header link
(→GTA V) |
m (header link) |
||
| (24 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{/header}} | {{User_talk:{{BASEPAGENAME}}/header}} | ||
== What's going on with {{tl|Navbox}}? == | == What's going on with {{tl|Navbox}}? == | ||
| Line 425: | Line 425: | ||
:It's already there. [[User:Gboyers|gboyers]] <sup>[[User_talk:Gboyers|talk]]</sup> 23:48, 25 October 2011 (BST) | :It's already there. [[User:Gboyers|gboyers]] <sup>[[User_talk:Gboyers|talk]]</sup> 23:48, 25 October 2011 (BST) | ||
Oh, last time I read it was this morning, sorry.--<font face="Papyrus" color="blue" size="3">[[User:Fairnick68|Fairnick68]]</font><font face="Papyrus" color="blue" size="2"><sup> [[User talk:Fairnick68|(talk)]]</sup></font> 23:50, 25 October 2011 (BST) | |||
:Well there's not much chance of a Grand Theft Auto game set in that era, there are virtually no cars, organised crime is limited, and it would just be a Red Dead game. So yeah I wouldn't worry about that! [[User:Gboyers|gboyers]] <sup>[[User_talk:Gboyers|talk]]</sup> 00:34, 26 October 2011 (BST) | |||
Ha, your right. Im still pretty shocked that they even announced it, I wasn't expecting that untill they were done promoting MP3. They surprised us all. Im kind of disappointed that they never answered the questions for GTA III, as the site may have that teaser all week. But hey, im happy we got an announcment!--<font face="Papyrus" color="blue" size="3">[[User:Fairnick68|Fairnick68]]</font><font face="Papyrus" color="blue" size="2"><sup> [[User talk:Fairnick68|(talk)]]</sup></font> 00:53, 26 October 2011 (BST) | |||
::That teaser is gone alreday and the site works like normal again. The GTA III thing is back as well. --[[User:Andreaz1|Andreaz1]] ([[User talk:Andreaz1|talk]]) 07:47, 26 October 2011 (BST) | |||
==Unused Images== | |||
Hey Gboyers, is it by any chance possible for you to find these images below a home? Also, if you can't find these images a home, can you please help me delete them please? They seem to be good images but they are not used and don't seem to serve a purpose on this wiki. Thanks.--[[User:MrLanceVanceDance|MrLanceVanceDance]] ([[User talk:MrLanceVanceDance|talk]]) 04:29, 29 October 2011 (BST) | |||
[[:File:Corporal.svg]], [[:File:Sergeant.svg]], [[:File:Colour Sergeant.png]], [[:File:Copyleft.svg]], [[:File:Copyright-yellow.svg]], [[:File:Question.svg]], [[:File:Reupload.PNG]], [[:File:Rodrigo X - Social Profile.png]], [[:File:GCLogo.png]] | |||
:As I've said before, the purpose of [[Special:UnusedImages]] isn't just to find them homes, it's to get rid of unwanted images. I hope you haven't been putting images on pages where they are unnecessary or unsuitable. I'll check those out, and delete any unwanted ones. I know a couple of them ''will'' be used but not just yet. I've changed your post above to link ''to'' the image instead of displaying them, because displaying them here wrongly removes them from UnusedImages. [[User:Gboyers|gboyers]] <sup>[[User_talk:Gboyers|talk]]</sup> 18:19, 29 October 2011 (BST) | |||
==RE:Activity== | |||
Yes, I'm still around, I just haven't had much to do around here recently. However, with the GTA V announcement I will certainly be more active. '''''[[User:Chimpso|Chimpso]]''''' ([[User Talk:Chimpso|Talk]]) 00:34, 30 October 2011 (BST) | |||
== Badge Question == | |||
Hey Gboyers, I have a question, if a user on Wikia achievement boost then does that user derserves a block?--[[User:4th hale|4th hale]] ([[User talk:4th hale|talk]]) 23:51, 31 October 2011 (GMT) | |||
:That sentence didn't make sense. If you're asking for my opinion on Wikia matters, that's nothing to do with me. We left that site for a reason, so I'm not going to spend my time fixing problems with that site. If you have a problem with that site, take it to that site's staff or to Wikia. If you must know my personal opinion, if people contribute good content that's great, if they add tons of crap or make dozens of false edits with the intention of increasing edit count, yes that is against '''our''' policy (idk about Wikia). [[User:Gboyers|gboyers]] <sup>[[User_talk:Gboyers|talk]]</sup> 00:39, 1 November 2011 (GMT) | |||
I was only asking '''your opinion''', it's something that a user did and I am fully aware it doesn't concern you but as I said I was asking your opinion on it.--[[User:4th hale|4th hale]] ([[User talk:4th hale|talk]]) 00:47, 1 November 2011 (GMT) | |||
== [[Community:Eras]] == | |||
Well, I did say I wanted to return to the discussion table on this. I'll get to it tomorrow. - [[User:ZS|ZS]] ([[User talk:ZS|talk]]) 18:11, 2 November 2011 (GMT) | |||
:I'll get back to you on the discussion. It'll take some time to respond to. - [[User:ZS|ZS]] ([[User talk:ZS|talk]]) 16:52, 5 November 2011 (GMT) | |||
== Confirmed Locations of GTA V == | |||
Hi Gboyers, apologies for the rather sudden absence, but i'm back. Would it be appropriate if I was to create new articles about the new locations confirmed in GTA V? I have got some relevant information I can include in the articles, but not so much. Should we all maybe wait until further detail is released about the game and it's areas or would it be fine to start the articles without them being seen as pointless. Thanks! -[[User:Montario|Montario]] ([[User talk:Montario|talk]]) 21:33, 2 November 2011 (GMT) | |||
:There's no rush - it would be silly having dozens of articles saying "Little Seoul is a place seen on a sign in the GTA V trailer" because we can't add anything more except wild speculation. The best thing to do would be to have [[Los Santos in GTA V]] and have a list of locations and a general description of the city. A bit like [[Vehicles in GTA V]]. --[[User:Gboyers|gboyers]] <sup>[[User_talk:Gboyers|talk]]</sup> 21:45, 2 November 2011 (GMT) | |||
== Grand Theft Mods concern == | |||
Hi again, if you look at the recent changes on Grand Theft Mods, people seem to be creating articles which have no reference to the GTA franchise at all, like [[gtm:Losing weight inside...|this]], and [[gtm:Individuals who are affl...|this]]. I brought this up, just in case you weren't aware. Thanks--[[User:Montario|Montario]] ([[User talk:Montario|talk]]) 11:10, 5 November 2011 (GMT) | |||
:Thanks, not checked that in a while, will sort it out! [[User:Gboyers|gboyers]] <sup>[[User_talk:Gboyers|talk]]</sup> 11:13, 5 November 2011 (GMT) | |||
== Female cops? == | |||
I have spoken to TheJustinAllenK and we have both wondered where the 'female cops' in the GTA V trailer are? Do we include it on the GTA V page, because neither of us have seen them. [[User:Bacon777|Bacon777]] ([[User talk:Bacon777|talk]]) 00:29, 6 November 2011 (GMT) | |||
:Look in the History of the page to see who added it, and asked then. If you can't see ANY evidence, then remove it until you find some. I'm sure, if we're wrong, someone will correct it, and you can ask them for proof. Please remember: because someone wrote it on another website does not make it proof. [[User:Gboyers|gboyers]] <sup>[[User_talk:Gboyers|talk]]</sup> 00:53, 6 November 2011 (GMT) | |||
== Red Dead article == | |||
I'm fine with it being deleted, but I could not see who did it... Was there any talk about this before it was deleted? Last time I checked, it was the same as it was 2 months ago.--<font face="Papyrus" color="blue" size="3">[[User:Fairnick68|Fairnick68]]</font><font face="Papyrus" color="blue" size="2"><sup> [[User talk:Fairnick68|(talk)]]</sup></font> 01:14, 11 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
:If you visit [[Red Dead Redemption|the page]], it tells you who deleted it. Also, at the top of [[Special:RecentChanges]] there are links to all the different [[Special:Log|logs]], including the [[Special:Log/delete|deletion log]]. No agreement was reached, but I have restored the [[Talk:Red Dead Redemption|talk page]] to allow the discussion to be continued if you wish. [[User:Gboyers|gboyers]] <sup>[[User_talk:Gboyers|talk]]</sup> 01:38, 11 November 2011 (UTC) | |||