Talk:Uni-Tel: Difference between revisions
just my input on this situation
No edit summary |
(just my input on this situation) |
||
| Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
The reason I think pages like [[Uni-Tel]] should not exist on their own is that the shop has no value in game, it is inaccessible, it is never referred to (eg by characters, websites, radio stations), and there is no reason why any page on this wiki would link to it - except a list of shops in GTA San Andreas, and possibly a list of travel agents (which again, would be useless). However we should still mention everything we can about this on a big list page. The reason we keep character pages, is because you can interact with them, and you might want to know more about it, and there might be a lot more we can find out (eg from other games, websites etc). But what is essentially a box with a picture of the shop on the front is irrelevant to most players, but I think we should still list it. Thoughts? [[w:c:gta:User:Gboyers|Gboyers]] <sup>[[:w:c:gta:User_talk:Gboyers|talk]]</sup> 13:39, 11 January 2009 (UTC) | The reason I think pages like [[Uni-Tel]] should not exist on their own is that the shop has no value in game, it is inaccessible, it is never referred to (eg by characters, websites, radio stations), and there is no reason why any page on this wiki would link to it - except a list of shops in GTA San Andreas, and possibly a list of travel agents (which again, would be useless). However we should still mention everything we can about this on a big list page. The reason we keep character pages, is because you can interact with them, and you might want to know more about it, and there might be a lot more we can find out (eg from other games, websites etc). But what is essentially a box with a picture of the shop on the front is irrelevant to most players, but I think we should still list it. Thoughts? [[w:c:gta:User:Gboyers|Gboyers]] <sup>[[:w:c:gta:User_talk:Gboyers|talk]]</sup> 13:39, 11 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
:I'm agree with listing stores such as this within a list or table, as you said, the average two sentances and image would easily fit on a list. This, hopefully, would also significantly reduce the amount of '''empty''' and '''lonely''' pages. However, there are certain articles for vehicles (the [[Vehicles in GTA 1|GTA 1]] (London included) and [[Vehicles in GTA 2|GTA 2]] vehicles to be precise) that have similar problems, so maybe it would be worth listing those in a similar manner, thus further reducing the '''empty pages''' list. The fact that GTA 1, GTA London and GTA 2 have a relatively small amount of vehicles would also make a table or list a more convenient way of displaying them. And, yes, I did create some pages for some of the vehicles in question recently, now I realise that it probably wasn't the best idea I've had so far. [[User:Hardrock182|Hardrock182]] 17:00, 12 January 2009 (UTC) | |||