Talk:Karen/spoilers: Difference between revisions

::Also, I removed the line you inserted because I felt it to be too much of an obvious "trap" to a naive reader (sorry, I should have been more clear in the edit summary).  Personally, I think we should ''not'' link to this article from the Michelle Stone article, as it offers too much of a propensity for people to have plot details spolied, as happened to [[User:KalypsoSig|KalypsoSig]].  As I see it, people are ''going'' to figure it out, one way or the other, either by clicking the link out of simple curiosity, or (more likely) by surmising why that line was even inserted into the article at all.  Perhaps we can say, "Michelle has a secret revealed later in the game", or something indirect and deliberately cryptic like that.  I'm just concerned that adding a link to here is far too obvious.  Besides, anyone reading about Michelle most likely has ''not'' discovered her "alter-ego", or else they would be reading ''this'' article instead, since they would know by then that Karen and Michelle are one and the same.  That having been said, I think the Michelle Stone article should ''only'' focus on that ''persona'', whereas this article should allude to both.  What do you think? '''[[User:Eganio|Eganio]]^{''[[User talk:Eganio|Talk]]''}''' 06:32, 20 July 2008 (UTC)