What Do you hate the most about Grand Theft Auto IV: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{forumheader|GTA}}
==What do you hate the most about GTA IV and Why?==
==What do you hate the most about GTA IV and Why?==
*a: The Failed Atemped at Realism
*a: The Failed Atemped at Realism
Line 22: Line 23:
*k: No Tanks
*k: No Tanks


====
 
B: I used to love flying in the hunter and the AT-400, but gta 4 replaced the hunter with the Annilator and the AT-400 with a non-obtainable Boeing 747{{forumheader|GTA}}
:B: I used to love flying in the hunter and the AT-400, but gta 4 replaced the hunter with the Annilator and the AT-400 with a non-obtainable Boeing 747


I'm just going to give counter reasons for your complaints;
I'm just going to give counter reasons for your complaints;
Line 37: Line 38:
*j: Dark Graphics ''turn the lighting up''
*j: Dark Graphics ''turn the lighting up''
*k: No Tanks ''It would have been nice, but only as a secret or easter egg though.[[User:Delo19xcrowbarx|Delo19xcrowbarx]] 07:19, July 29, 2010 (UTC)''
*k: No Tanks ''It would have been nice, but only as a secret or easter egg though.[[User:Delo19xcrowbarx|Delo19xcrowbarx]] 07:19, July 29, 2010 (UTC)''
:You just added "Failed Atemped at" realism. The game wasn't even aimed at being as realistic as possible. Obviously Niko won't limp when shot in the leg. Obviously the car won't be instantly totaled when colliding into a wall. Obviously the police will forget who Niko is when he travels into a Pay n Spray. The list goes on and on. The problem with the "GTA 4 being too realistic" argument is that it is so ridiculous to claim that when you at least considered the basic gameplay that is so outrageously unrealistic. Does that make sense to you?--'''[[User:Spaceeinstein|spaceeinstein]]''' 03:59, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
12,236

edits