13,610
edits
Talk:Ganton: Difference between revisions
→???
(→???) |
(→???) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
::Well, actually we can have an article on ever individual safehouse but ONLY in long-term future... in other words, it's not high priority right now. So, in effect, it makes sense to have an article like [[Safehouses in Los Santos]] example you gave as start.... So an article on every individual safehouse isn't ruled out... only that it will be reserved in later future... there's always tomorrow, I say! :p --[[User:Chief of Staff|Legion]] 17:09, 2 May 2007 (BST) (Man of the Future) | ::Well, actually we can have an article on ever individual safehouse but ONLY in long-term future... in other words, it's not high priority right now. So, in effect, it makes sense to have an article like [[Safehouses in Los Santos]] example you gave as start.... So an article on every individual safehouse isn't ruled out... only that it will be reserved in later future... there's always tomorrow, I say! :p --[[User:Chief of Staff|Legion]] 17:09, 2 May 2007 (BST) (Man of the Future) | ||
:We don't even have a list of every single safehouse - so we should not have ANY articles on individual safehouses, unless they are special places (eg the [[Four Dragons]] casino or the Johnson house). Maybe when we have [[Safehouses in Los Santos]] ''(and SF, LV then the game names for single-cities: [[Safehouses in GTA III]] and VC, LCS and VCS)'' and every city done properly - THEN we can consider expanding it. Not worth considering or preparing for yet, but you're right in that one day it might be a useful way of doing it. [[User:Xenon|Xenon]] ([[User talk:Xenon|?]]) 17:20, 2 May 2007 (BST) | |||