392
edits
Talk:Uni-Tel: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
::First of all, please '''do not''' tell me what I do and do not believe. How can you know? Second of all, I think that down the line having images of pedestrians would be an idea worth doing. Also, I find it funny that you say this wiki is messy and try to suggest that articles like this should not be here, yet none of the pages you have linked to have Uni-Tel on them. This is because it is not orphaned and is properly categorised, in a sub-category for the businesses category. [[User:A-Dust|A-Dust]] 13:17, 4 June 2008 (UTC) | ::First of all, please '''do not''' tell me what I do and do not believe. How can you know? Second of all, I think that down the line having images of pedestrians would be an idea worth doing. Also, I find it funny that you say this wiki is messy and try to suggest that articles like this should not be here, yet none of the pages you have linked to have Uni-Tel on them. This is because it is not orphaned and is properly categorised, in a sub-category for the businesses category. [[User:A-Dust|A-Dust]] 13:17, 4 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
:::You're showing a disturbing propensity for missing my point entirely, this is not about Uni-Tel - which is merely an example of what I'm talking about - this is about the thinking behind this article, behind the wiki at large. I'm talking about [[Category:Travel Agents|over-specific categories]] with only one article in them; I'm talking about the fact that when you take several dozen small fragments of related information and scatter them all over the place rather than keeping them together, it's inevitable that you'll make a mess or at least make it all much harder to manage and organize. Say for example that you wanted to re-categorize every "Location" article in the wiki. If all of the locations were grouped together in a list, with only the most important ones given their own articles. It would be relatively easy. But as it is now, with every single location, however small or insignificant, granted it's own article, it would be ''much'' harder. Of course, there are bots, but if that's what you were about to say, you were about to miss my point ''again''. | |||
<blockquote> | |||
:::<small>"please '''do not''' tell me what I do and do not believe. How can you know?"</small> | |||
</blockquote> | |||
:::Now, assuming you actually meant what you said about "everything", it's actually very simple. Would you or would you not draw the line at an article documenting how many street lights, stop signs and traffic lights can be found in each city...? Well, there's your answer. --[[User:MattyDienhoff|MattyDienhoff]] 13:39, 4 June 2008 (UTC) | |||