13,610
edits
Talk:Uni-Tel: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
(unindent) To settle this argument by consensus, do any other users have opinions on this subject? I've made my stance clear, that ingame businesses should be given their own articles like many of the characters have. As for my argument on the Liberty City articles, why should each rendition of the city be given their own article? They make comparisons difficult and can make finding the correct article difficult for new members. All the information could be stated within one article, which is what you had suggested to do for the ingame businesses that do not fit a very subjective notability criteria. Anyway, other views? [[User:A-Dust|A-Dust]] 14:51, 4 June 2008 (UTC) | (unindent) To settle this argument by consensus, do any other users have opinions on this subject? I've made my stance clear, that ingame businesses should be given their own articles like many of the characters have. As for my argument on the Liberty City articles, why should each rendition of the city be given their own article? They make comparisons difficult and can make finding the correct article difficult for new members. All the information could be stated within one article, which is what you had suggested to do for the ingame businesses that do not fit a very subjective notability criteria. Anyway, other views? [[User:A-Dust|A-Dust]] 14:51, 4 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
:That isn't the only issue. Bluntly, they should have their own articles IF you can write lots of stuff about them. All you can say about Uni-Tel is where it is, and what is written on the sign. You can say more about shops/buildings that are enterable or are safehouses or are involved in missions. You could fit everything about Uni-Tel into a simple list or table. Yes you are are right that it doesn't exist anywhere else, but it SHOULD be listed on "Fake shops/businesses in GTA San Andreas" or whatever - there SHOULD be a list of them, but there should NOT be individual pages UNTIL that list is complete. THEN we can consider having individual pages for SOME of the articles which are worth writing about.<br><br>As for [[Liberty City in GTA III]] - that page can have a lot written about it. Although yes, it is currently badly organised and needs to be fixed. I'm going to have [[Liberty City in the GTA III Era]] or something which details the city, then just small sections about what changed. Obviously [[Liberty City in GTA IV]] is going to be a very different article. - [[w:c:gta:User:Gboyers|Gboyers]] <sup>[[:w:c:gta:User_talk:Gboyers|talk]]</sup> 17:43, 4 June 2008 (UTC) | |||