68,823
edits
(Removing gallery, after image was deleted during the move.) |
|||
(10 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
::Maybe we can create a category for cars that have wreck versions in GTA IV, and this page could be used for your idea. Also, this page could just be a disambig, with a section for both ideas, linking to cars that have a wreck version in one section, and cars that are found burnt out in another.. Thoughts? '''[[User:Biggest gta fan ever|Biggest GTA Fan Ever]]<sup>''[[User talk:Biggest gta fan ever|Talk]]''</sup>''' 00:02, 28 February 2009 (UTC) | ::Maybe we can create a category for cars that have wreck versions in GTA IV, and this page could be used for your idea. Also, this page could just be a disambig, with a section for both ideas, linking to cars that have a wreck version in one section, and cars that are found burnt out in another.. Thoughts? '''[[User:Biggest gta fan ever|Biggest GTA Fan Ever]]<sup>''[[User talk:Biggest gta fan ever|Talk]]''</sup>''' 00:02, 28 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
:::Seems like a good idea to me, I suppose the category could just be called something like 'Wrecks' or 'Jumk Cars'. To be honest, I see no problems with the category being used universally to refer to 'beaters' ''and'' burnt-out wrecks, as there are no burnt-out versions of the [[Vigero]], [[Sabre]], or [[Emperor (car)|Emperor]] in GTA IV (but their 'beater' counterparts could still be referred to as 'Wrecks' or 'Junk Cars'). Furthermore the [[Tampa]] and [[Clover]] from GTA San Andreas would fall into that category. - [[User:Hardrock182|Hardrock182]] 00:14, 28 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
I have turned the page into a disambig. What do you think of the format? Any other ideas of what this page should be used for? '''[[User:Biggest gta fan ever|Biggest GTA Fan Ever]]<sup>''[[User talk:Biggest gta fan ever|Talk]]''</sup>''' 04:54, 9 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
:Wait a minute. The use of beaters can be traced all the way back to GTA:SA, when they had cars with mismatched panels (e.g. the [[Tampa]] and [[Clover]]), as well as the beater "Ghost" [[Glendale]]s in the woods. There could be something salvageable about this article. - [[User:ZS|ZS]] 16:54, 9 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Is the Regina a beater? == | |||
I don't have GTA IV TLAD but I saw [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u_MYheaCp-g this video] on Youtube, and you can see the car backfiring, and at 2:20 you can see what looks to be a beat-up one.--[[User:Thescarydude|Thescarydude]] 14:11, 30 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
I don't think so. Sure the Regina's all beat up, but I think that that's just a not-as-nice version of the Regina showed earlier in the video. [[User:MAINEiac4434|MAINEiac4434]] 20:31, May 13, 2010 (UTC) | |||
:It does behave like a beater (junky engine noise and backfiring, just to name some), but it only has a faded body color to show in appearance (on the level of the [[Tampa]] and [[Clover]] in GTASA). I'll leave it to your guys to decide. - [[User:ZS|ZS]] 20:40, May 13, 2010 (UTC) | |||
: | |||
:I can't find the Elegant wrecks on GTA4. Anyone care to post pictures? | |||
::Its the most common wreck in the game. | |||
::Looks like a Roadmster but with 1994–1999 DeVille taillights, I'm not sure if it is an Elegant, but its generally accepted to be.--[[User:Thescarydude|Thescarydude]] 16:04, July 30, 2010 (UTC) | |||
"It's the most common wreck in the game", eh? | |||
Thought it was a Hakumai [[User:Haruhi Suzumiya|Haruhi Suzumiya]] 09:34, August 6, 2010 (UTC) |